Recognized as opposed to stated societal referent acceptance and you will connection commitment and time and energy

Recognized as opposed to stated societal referent acceptance and you will connection commitment and time and energy

Lover needs into the online dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from appealing to appalling: Disenchantment having an intimate mate. Sociological Viewpoints, forty two, 263-280. [ Website links ]

Fiore, An excellent. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily within the online dating: Whenever might you including anyone for example your self? CHI, meeting to your human activities within the computing assistance. 1317-1374. [ Hyperlinks ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you may incompatibility when you look at the kids’ fellow and you can sis dating. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict relationship (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. Elizabeth., & Christensen, A great. (2004). Wild birds out of a good feather otherwise strange birds? Connections among identification dimensions, similarity, and you will ily Psychology, cuatro, 564-574. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Couples resemblance and you can marital fulfillment: Was similar partners pleased. Record out-of Personality, 74, 1401-1420. [ Links ]

Goffman, Age. (1952). Towards the cooling the mark away: Particular aspect of type to incapacity. Psychiatry, 15, 451-463. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Similarity, overlap, and you will relationships satisfaction inside the relationship and you may married couples. Journal out of Identity and you can Public Therapy, 93, 34-forty eight. [ Hyperlinks ]

Individual Dating, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Echo, mirror: The necessity of seems into the daily life. Albany: County College or university of brand new York Drive. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Matching theory. Inside H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia regarding individual relationships (Vol. dos, pp. 10651067). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., & Hay, J. (1985). Equity and you may romantic connections: Previous look. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict dating (pp. 91-117). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Hitsch, Grams. J., Hortacsu, A beneficial., & Ariely, D. (2010). Coordinating and you will sorting when you look at the matchmaking. American Monetary Opinion, 100, 130-163. [ Links ]

Houran, J., Lange, Roentgen., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Create on line matchmaking evaluating work? An evaluation off initial research getting an advertised ‘predictive brand of erican Journal from Psychology, 6, 507-526. [ Website links ]

Houts, R. M., Robins, Elizabeth., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility while the growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Links ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). Early relationship sources away from conjugal distress and you may divorce. Latest Tips for the Psychological Science, ten, 116-119. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Inclusion. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible dating (pp. 1-7). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Yards. R. (2009)patibility. Within the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia out-of people relationships (Vol. step one, pp. 283-286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Hyperlinks ]

Kalick, S. Meters., & Hamilton III, T. E. (1986). The matching hypothesis reexamined. Diary from Identification and you will Personal Therapy, 51 , 673-682. [ Hyperlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital top quality and you may balances: A review of principle, actions, and you can research. Mental Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Backlinks ]

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, marital interaction, therefore the trajectory away from marital satisfaction. Journal away from Personality and Societal Mindset, 72, 1075-1092. [ Hyperlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual affects with the marriage: Ramifications for policy and you will input. Current Tips for the Psychological Research, fourteen, 171-174. [ Hyperlinks ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A beneficial., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Taking a look at close dating. In the H. H. Kelley, Elizabeth. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, Grams. Levinger. D. R. https://internationalwomen.net/sv/kazakhstan-kvinnor/ Peterson (Eds.), Personal dating (pp. 20-67). New york: Freeman. [ Links ]

Leave a Comment!

O seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados com *